pnBlawg

the professional negligence blog

A collaboration between Rebmark Legal Solutions and 1 Chancery Lane

Warning against overly long bundles and skeleton arguments

Caldero Trading Ltd v Leibson Corporation Ltd & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 935 was a commercial law appeal. It was listed for three days. The Court was presented with no less than 17 lever arch files of documents and authorities. The appellant’s skeleton argument (including a schedule and four appendices) was 72 pages long; the respondent’s (including also four appendices) ran to 67 pages... [More]

Skeletons in the Courtroom

When I was at law school we only allowed to produce skeleton arguments for moots if they did not exceed four sentences in length. It was no easy task, but it really forced one to be as lexically economical and phraseologically elegant as possible.   However since, I have been encouraged to be far more expansive. I have thence been lead to believe that a skeleton argument is a powerful means o... [More]